Instructions for Daily Diaries
Do the following everyday for six
days, starting 11-25-2005. Turn in the
diaries and your summery responses (as noted below) on 11-1-2005.
1.
Write a
short description of all the group related incidents that occurred to you or
you observed during the day. Group related incidents are those where
social group membership effects the behaviors and
comments of people. These can be comments about a group or
particular members of group (e.g., stereotypes, jokes, linguistic bias) or
behaviors that people do or do not do because of another person's group
membership (e.g., social distancing, staring, avoidance, exclusion). Pay
particular attention to the incidents that had to do with the social groups we
are examining in this class (gender, race/ethnic groups, religious groups,
heavy people, gay/lesbian/bisexual people). Indicate
the group/groups involved.
If you did not experience or
observe anything, note that nothing happened of relevance that day.
2. Rate the extent to which you
perceive the events to be indicative of prejudice or are discriminatory.
-2 definitely not at all indicative
of prejudice or discriminatory
-1 probably not indicative of
prejudice or discriminatory
0 uncertain
+1 probably prejudicial or discriminatory
+ 2 definitely prejudicial or
discriminatory
For the events
that you recorded as being uncertain, probably, or definitely prejudicial
answer the following questions.
3. What group or groups were the targets of
the incidents?
4. Would you classify the prejudice or discrimination
as:
a) hostile/contemptuous
b) paternalistic
c) envy
related
d) something
else or unsure, explain
4. Record your emotional response
to the event
5. Record your immediate and delayed
response to the event, if any. Indicate why you choose the response you choice.
6. On last day, summarize
your experience by answer
questions at end of this web page. Turn in your diaries and typed
responses to the summery questions. (The diaries do not need to be
typed.)
![]()
Examples:
Event 1:
1. Group: Latino/a
I was talking to someone and they
indicated that they did not want to go somewhere. In their description of
the place they said that the place had signs up in two different languages
which was supposed to be the evidence that their was
poorer quality service by the people running the place.
2. + 2 probably prejudice
against Latino/as
3. prejudice
against Latino/as
4. contemptuous
5. Frustrated. I could
see no way around convincing this person that there was something wrong about
what they were saying.
6. I did not say
anything. The person would have probably have been defensive and I saying
something would have likely have made it worse. The person was telling me
this within the context of a description of some personal difficulties.
Confronting would have undermined social support for the other issues.
Event 2:
Event 2:
1. Group: women and
men.
A sign was posted by a girl in our
neighborhood offering her service as a "mother's helper." It
seemed to imply that fathers wouldn't need help and perpetuated the idea that
child care is women's responsibility.
2. +2 definitely prejudicial
against women
+2 definitely not prejudicial
against men.
3. prejudice
against women and men.
4. Doesn’t seem to fit any of the
three categories. Perhaps paternalistic toward women.
5. Resentful
6. I did Nothing.
I wasn't sure what to do because it wasn't a face-to-face communication.
It also would likely be received as rude by most of the neighborhood.
![]()
On the last day Summarize your experience by answering the following
questions.
Please type your responses.
I’d expect about a paragraph or two for each question. Yielding
about two typed pages.
1. Give a general description
of the events you observed.
What group or groups were the targets
of the experiences you observe? Who were the perpetrators? What did
the perpetrators do? (e.g., exclude people, physical threats, made
prejudicial or stereotypical comments, harassment, implied
prejudice by choice of words).
Did they tend to be of a particular
type of prejudice/discrimination?
If there were some that were hard to classify, is there any pattern to
them?
2. How did you decide whether
the incidents you observed reflected prejudice?
Were they negative comments about a
group or about an individual based upon group membership? Were they comments
that communicated stereotypes about a group? Have you heard this person
say similar things before?
3. What was the range of
emotional and behavioral responses you had to the event(s)? What affected the
type of response(s) you had to the event(s). Did you confront
anyone? Why or why not? Where you satisfied in your responses or lack
of responses?
4. How did keeping track of these
incidents affect you?
For instance, did it increase your
awareness of prejudice toward other groups? Toward your own
group? Did it make you more likely to label events as prejudiced? Did it
make you depressed or angry? Were you more likely to respond to events that you
might normally ignore or not notice. If you did not
observe any prejudice, did this surprise you. Why do
you think others did and you did not.
If you did not observe any event
this week, please pick an event that you have observed in your past and answer
the questions below. Please note in your response that you are describing a
recalled event rather than an event that over the week.